HISTORIC DISTRICTS AND LANDSCAPES
The communities of the NTC have a long and rich history of settlement,
and a record of historic structures and landscapes that is unique to
the region. Protecting these historic resources is an important –
if not crucial – way to protect the rural character of the NTC
communities. One way to do that, as was previously discussed, is to
develop a landmarks commission to oversee the enforcement of a variety
of ordinances designed to protect the NTC’s historic resources.
These ordinances are the enforcement tools that will protect both structures
and landscapes from development that destroys the historic character
or setting of the structures and settlements.
An ordinance protecting an historic landmark, or district, may require
owners of the landmark, or those who may make changes on other properties
that dramatically change the setting of the landmark, to obtain approval
from a review board before altering their properties. Such ordinances
can also create historic districts where the entire landscape and series
of buildings can be protected for their historic value. The creation
of historic protection ordinances and districts are difficult processes,
but they are especially important to saving what is unique about the
NTC area. Technical resources are available from the Pennsylvania Bureau
for Historic Preservation. A sample of a historic commission and design
review language is provided in Appendix Two.
Such historic preservation ordinances (particularly for structures)
can also rely on the guidelines presented by the U.S. Secretary for
the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. These ordinances
can also be designed to require impact analysis of any new development
on the landscape or other historic physical features that are important
for the townships to protect. Loudon County, Virginia requires a review
of “the relationship of the size, design and siting of any new
or reconstructed structure to the landscape of a district.” Hence,
resources such as the Owego-Milford Turnpike (Figure 6.9) could be protected
under such an ordinance and any change to the unique setting of the
feature would require review and be subject to the commission’s
approval.
SPECIAL PURPOSE ORDINANCES
Many of the issues raised by township officials during the numerous
interviews conducted during the fall pointed to concerns about environmental
quality, and wariness regarding the effects of extractive industries
on the area’s rural quality and environmental health. These concerns
were addressed in the previous section of this booklet. Specific ordinances
oriented to these concerns can be drafted such as regulating the siting
of challenging land uses and protecting the quality of streams and lakes,
among a variety of others. The Silver Lake and Choconut Comprehensive
Plans already have some such ordinances. Some of the other ordinances
that already exist are:
- Building Permit Ordinance - to comply with the National Flood Insurance
Program
- Building Setback Ordinance - to require all structures be setback
a minimum of fifty feet from Township rights of way
- Hazardous Waste Management Ordinance
- Solid Waste Source Ordinance
- Ordinance for Permit and Regulation of Waste Facilities.
This list of ordinances can be expanded to address a variety of other
issues – such as siting quarries and managing the health of streams
and forests. It should be noted that in these sections are discussions
of a variety of programs and tax mechanisms that can be used to help
in mitigating some of the threats to rural quality as presented by various
uses. More information on these programs are included in the individual
and team reports created by class members during the fall of 2001 in
Appendix I
QUARRY ORIENTED ORDINANCES AND TAX PROGRAMS
Quarries are important industries in the NTC area. However, they also
cause damage to environmental systems due to the sediment runoff associated
with the quarrying of the rock. A quarry ordinance can require a quarry
and/or mining operation, which involves the excavation of 1,000 tons
of material per year, to obtain permits from the township.
Quarries need to be environmentally responsible in terms of actual
quarrying, removing debris, and cleaning up after the quarry is retired.
Pennsylvania has a “mine reclamation” program, funded through
Growing Greener. Mine reclamation focuses on re-mining by using “green”
technologies. The thrust of the program is on reclaiming abandoned mines.
It attempts to help industries adopt environmentally responsible mining
practices. “Mine reclamation and well plugging refer to the process
of cleaning up environmental pollutants and safety hazards associated
with a site and returning the land to a productive condition, similar
to DEP’s Brownfields program” (Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection, website). Quarries need to apply and qualify
for funding. Unfortunately this does not ensure environmental accountability
of active quarry operators. Quarries also cost townships money in terms
of the environmental degradation they can cause. The townships need
mechanisms to cover the costs they absorb as a result of quarry operations
and to prevent significant environmental degradation. Such mechanisms
are discussed in several individual and group reports.
FOREST MANAGEMENT ORDINANCES
Forestry is an important part of the economy and landscape of the
NTC area, but if practices are to continue, the coalition should consider
actively promoting sustainable forestry regulations and education programs.
As part of the regulatory process, townships could pass an ordinance
that defines the time period in which logging should or should not take
place, to protect against on-site erosion. Dirt logging roads that bear
the weight of immense log trucks release tremendous amounts of sediment
from runoff especially in wet, springtime conditions. Townships, through
consultation with a licensed forester, could limit or ban logging during
spring time periods to control erosion, while protecting the watershed’s
water quality.
Another strategy would be to pass ordinances that require forest management
plans for timbering operations and landowners in the community. Management
methods exist for wildlife habitat, soil and water conservation, all
manners of recreation, aesthetics, and timber as income for the present,
or timber as an investment for the future. Good management is much more
than simply harvesting trees. It includes tending, weeding, insect control,
disease control, wildlife management, watershed protection, forest regeneration,
aesthetic concerns, and harvesting.
RIPARIAN PROTECTION ORDINANCES
Stream restoration and protection are the focus of much research.
Many advances have been made in the development of restoration technologies
and best management practices for both the mining industry and agriculture.
One practice that has become commonplace in watershed protection is
the implementation of riparian buffers. Riparian buffers are vegetated
strips of land that border creeks, streams, and rivers, protected from
development and agricultural use. Streams of the area with riparian
buffers are shown in Figure 2.15.
Riparian buffers offer several environmental benefits. They protect
the waterway by filtering runoff and promoting sediment deposition.
Excess nutrients are absorbed and used by the vegetation rather than
entering the water body directly. Riparian buffers also slow the velocity
of floodwaters and the volume of water entering a waterway via root
absorption. The intact root mass of the vegetation aids in soil stability
and slows bank erosion. Wildlife habitat is also a crucial reason for
riparian buffers. Many species of amphibians require undisturbed riparian
areas for breeding. In addition, forested buffers maintain the cooler
water temperatures necessary for brook trout and other native aquatics.
The size of the riparian buffer directly affects its effectiveness.
Riparian buffer widths may vary depending on the environmental setting,
level of protection desired, and landowner’s interests. Riparian
corridor protection ordinances have been promulgated in recent years
that take into the account the research promoting stream buffers. Such
ordinances can require buffers, management plans and good soil conservation
practices on parcels adjacent to streams. In addition, a subdivision
regulation can prohibit construction of structures within the buffer
area of a stream, which can be enforced through the process of site
plan review.
< previous section
| return to index | next
section >